A PSA built especially for MSPs? Does it make a difference?

A PSA software solution purpose-built for MSPs can be a game-cha…

I will stop myself right here. 

As an MSP, you have probably wondered what difference does it make, between using a service desk or using a PSA tool “purpose-built” for MSPs?

I need ticketing. I need a portal to manage clients. Why can’t I use a service desk that probably works just fine? Is there more to these “purpose-built” tools than meets the eye? 

The short answer is that something that is not made with you or your pain points in mind can only do so much for you

For the long answer, read on.

1. Service desks don’t cover your billing needs

Most service desks out there don’t offer billing and invoicing features. Their targeted customers don’t work with these features extensively, and if they do, they would have to integrate the service desk with a billing solution like Xero or find a service provider who provides the integration. 

Service desks lack the essentials that make an MSP business.

As an MSP, you heavily depend on invoicing and time tracking to run your business. From creating invoices to setting recurring payments to tracking the payments made, you need a good billing mechanism that enables everything in one place. You are bound to get in trouble when your ability to get paid depends on a poorly integrated solution. This brings us to the next argument.

2. Service desks are not optimized for things that matter to an MSP

Let’s say you manage to find a service desk that has all the essential features an MSP uses. The question now boils down to efficiency. Take time tracking, for example. Service desks let you configure time tracking to track where your team spends time. This includes granular assessments like how much time a technician spends on each ticket.

Service desks optimize time tracking for productivity, not profitability.

Time tracking in managed services has a whole different connotation. Managed services have a vastly different business model that banks on the accurate tracking of work delivered to make revenue and establish profitability. Even for MSPs who don’t charge by time but by project or task, they still need to track the time they spend, for driving effective revenue decisions and pricing models. Service desks look at time tracking through the lens of productivity rather than profitability, which reveals why MSPs who run their business using a service desk have a hard time billing clients the way they want to. They eventually give up and optimize themselves for the tool they're using instead of the other way around.

3. Service desks are not optimized for revenue metrics either

The most important differentiator between a PSA and a service desk is:

Service desks help you run things better. A PSA helps you make revenue.

A PSA is purpose-built for managing contracts, tracking billable hours, and using both to generate accurate invoices. Using a PSA can help an MSP make revenue-impacting decisions because the tool can paint a clear-cut picture of which client is your most and least profitable and where you incur the most cost and get the least returns. Since these metrics are a natural part of how a PSA operates, it can help an MSP grow, not just operate.

Related reading: How to be a more profitable MSP with your PSA tool

4. Service desks aren’t cut out for heavyweight client management

Most service desk client management features are so lightweight they’re almost invisible. They don’t offer a convenient portal for hosting all requestor information. And what happens when they don’t? Here are a few possible day-to-day scenarios.

  • Your techs will not be able to manage clients in a way they are used to.
  • Time taken to resolve a ticket isn’t transferred to an invoice directly.